and from how it is intended to be read)
CONSCIOUSNESS AND WORLD VIEWS
In the previous article, we discussed the distinguishing characteristics of open and closed consciousness. A relevant question for us at this point is this: If the intention of Infinite Mind (that referred to as God) is expanding consciousness, creating ever more variety of experience, why is closed consciousness so dominating within the world?
Let's try to answer that question as compactly as possible. We need to understand the physical world as a realm where individual consciousnesses can evolve toward enlightenment. Think of it as a school that presents lessons and challenges. As we deal with the challenges of physicality, we eventually learn that love is the answer, because the journey is one toward realization of Oneness and Unity. Considering the spectrum of consciousness that we described in earlier parts of this series, the "lower" levels within the spectrum are characterized by fear, the "higher" levels, by love. The response to fear is closed consciousness. The opening of consciousness is movement toward love. As we have already seen, individual consciousnesses are at different points within the spectrum.
We cannot answer the question of why closed consciousness is so dominating without discussing the concept of the ego. The two, closed consciousness and the ego are integrally related. So a quick review. The idea is that when an individualized consciousness (or spirit) takes on physical form by incarnating into this physical realm, it immediately begins to develop a persona of the world fashioned by its particular environment. That is to say that the individual absorbs and takes on the consciousness of its environment.
The thing is that the mass consciousness (i.e., the average consciousness) of the planet is focused in fear and in convictions of limitation. We refer to this persona (with its convictions of limitation) that the individual takes on, as ego. And the reason that mass consciousness is so focused in fear and limitation is because it is dominated by ego consciousness. Elsewhere on this site I have described ego as a body of false belief that seems to have taken on a life of its own - false because all beliefs and convictions that are born of fear, are false. What do we mean by "false"? We mean that they are not consistent with Higher Truth, the transcendent Truth of Spirit, Infinite, Eternal, Ultimate Truth. Thus we sometimes hear the ego also referred to as the false self. That of course infers a True Self. The struggles and challenges we experience are born of the fact that in this 3-D format of physicality we have lost awareness of our eternal True Self, and, in turn, identify almost totally with the false self, our ego self.
It is important to understand that this taking on of an ego persona is just part of the scheme of the Universe. So, it is not to be anguished over; but at the same time, it is also part of the scheme that the entity is supposed to seek the light of the True Self, and be willing to release the identity with the false self and re-identify with True Self. Until we awaken to this purpose, we have difficulty seeing through the veil of ego, and accordingly, all of our perceptions are the limited and fear-ridden ones of ego.
So now we have a correlation between ego and closed consciousness. (And correspondingly, the opening of consciousness is characterized by the releasing of ego obsessions.) Since the ego is fear based, it is very threatened by ambiguity and by ideas that are inconsistent with its own. Thus it prefers agreement and certainty about life. It is very selfish in these pursuits because it feels so vulnerable when it is not in control.
In terms of world views, ego fixation leads individuals to prefer traditions and institutions that promote consistency. It inclines them to prefer the comfort of groups that are bonded in like-mindedness. Dogma is sought; ambiguity vigorously rejected. This mindset is distinctive of closed consciousness. So it is not surprising that individuals who are in full identity with ego would embrace world views that are characterized by tradition, predictability and rigid doctrinaire beliefs. They would gravitate to religion and identity sets that are characteristic of themselves. Examples would be gender identity, racial identity, national identity, regional identity, political identity, social issues identity, moral values identity and more.
To avoid a common mistake that occurs from our habit of distinguishing people by position within a political spectrum -- i.e., left or right -- we should realize that either end of that spectrum is as fixed in certainty and adamancy as the other. Thus it would be somewhat more accurate to think in terms of proximity to the radical ends of that spectrum - the closer to either of the ends, the more intense the fixation in ego.
Metaphysical Spirituality
Here I wish to introduce a world view (if that word even fits in this case) that is more reflective of open consciousness.
This would be the perspective of the transcendent aspects of life from which I write, what I refer to as metaphysical spirituality. The phrase metaphysical spirituality is purposefully intended to make the very significant distinction from religious spirituality. You will likely not recognize the phrase as one that indicates any particular wisdom tradition, because intentionally, it does not. For that reason, you will also find that the phrase metaphysical spirituality is deliberately not capitalized. It denotes a perspective that is not atheistic, not religious, not purely scientific, and most importantly, not doctrinal or ideological. Some might refer to this approach to the mystical or divine realm simply as spirituality; others, as I frequently do, refer to it as metaphysics. But since metaphysics is also a branch of philosophy, I should point out that as I use the word, it specifically refers to a spiritual take on reality -- not to a philosophical school of thought.
Omitting the word spirituality in no way diminishes the importance of spirit as a fundamental and essential presumption of metaphysical spirituality. That said, I stress that the word spirit is entirely unconnected to religion. Considering the conventional wisdom that matters of spirit are relegated to the realm of religion, this point may cause some cognitive dissidence on the part of some. So let's be clear that while religion may be about spiritual matters, spirit is definitely NOT about religion. And further, metaphysical spirituality is definitely not part of conventional wisdom.
Spirit is life. The word comes from the Latin root spiare, meaning "to breathe". The Universe is about movement, and spirit is what moves. Spirit is transcendent, which is to say, beyond the experience of the material / physical world as perceived through the five senses. It is only the shackles of habit and custom that automatically casts the non-material into the realm of religion. And most assuredly, as an expression of open consciousness, the point of metaphysical spirituality is to not be bound by habit and custom.
Also, in emphasizing that I do not use the word metaphysics as a school of philosophy, my intention is to make clear an essential attribute of metaphysical spirituality -- that it is austere and simple. It aims toward minimalism - not complexity. By contrast, most philosophical schools of thought, being the fruit of intense intellectual activity, are quite complex. Metaphysical spirituality is more intuitive.
There are quite a number of metaphysical wisdom traditions and schools of thought. They have all been worked and polished into a coherency that in some respects looks quite similar to the doctrines of religions. There is a primary distinction however in the intention of such coherency that differs from religion. The philosophical structure of most, though not all metaphysical schools, is simply for the purpose of coherent organization. With religion it is that, but even more so, it serves as a statement of a doctrine.
Since metaphysical spirituality has regard for essential concepts and principles of transcendence, but holding them in a generalized rather than structured sense, many students of particular metaphysical schools of thought would find little disagreement with its basic outlook regarding the higher aspects of life. At the same time however they might possibly feel that it lacks sufficient complexity for their tastes.
I would never refer to metaphysical spirituality as a "belief system". There is not one to promote nor any to teach. It is about something much larger than mere belief "systems" - consciousness. The fact that metaphysical spirituality has no set doctrine can make metaphysics appear incoherent to the casual observer. The whole point of religious doctrine after all, is coherency. It sets forth very explicit and clear (and often complex) statements of what the beliefs are. For metaphysical spirituality, it is more about discovery of some common ideas, concepts and principles. It is presumed that with such discovery comes growth in awareness. But, there is nothing that says that any of the ideas must be believed. And, while there is no set doctrine and no call for the seeker to believe any of the concepts and principles, one does come to discover a magnificent coherence.
In the end, this sense of profound coherence has far greater impact for the seeker than if it came via a prescribed doctrine. The feeling of understanding that results is at a far deeper level because it comes together naturally from within as insight builds upon insight. The interesting thing is that the coherency is alive, meaning that it is not founded upon fixed beliefs. In fact, beliefs don't carry all that much importance. Beliefs develop, but are always held with the attitude that they are impermanent and subject to change. With ongoing insight the beliefs move and shift. That's what makes it a living coherency. Do you see the connection to open consciousness here? The sense of coherence that the seeker experiences within becomes so powerful that nothing else can match it.
So it is then that from this perspective of metaphysical spirituality, we are positioned to show that open free-flowing consciousness is not only what will save the planet, but is the only way that can lead to peace, harmony and cooperation on earth. I am not referring here to any mythical Nirvana, but rather to a world where love and compassion replace fear and certainty, the latter pair being responsible for inhumane acts and horrid conditions of poverty, starvation and disease.
End of Part
4; look for Part
5,
coming.
Copyright ©, 2007, William Gunderson
All Rights Reserved
No
part of this article may be reproduced for distribution without
the express permission and consent of the author. To obtain permission,
contact the author via email.
< Proceed to Part 5 | Part 6 |